The Party-Breaker

Two years ago it was conventional wisdom — even I bought into it — that President Bush, whatever else his successes or failures, was a party-builder. One could admire his political skill even if one disagreed with his policies. Well, how does that hold up today?

That the 2008 elections are already fully occupying the media’s attention is a sign not just of Bush’s status as a lame-duck but of his failure as a party-builder. He’s failed in the most basic party-building role of an incumbent president: picking a successor. Not only did the GOP lose control of both houses of Congress in ’06, it has no presidential heir apparent. When was the last time both parties had open fields like this? Not since LBJ dropped out of the Democratic primaries in 1968 — and even then, Nixon was in a more secure position for the GOP nomination than Hillary now is for the Democratic one. Other factors, including front-loaded primaries and campaign-finance reforms that have made fundraising a full-time task, have contributed to the accelerated 2008 campaign. But President Bush guaranteed it would be a mad scramble by keeping Dick Cheney around beyond 2004. We can thank him for the 24/7 campaign 2008 coverage.

Addendum: Maybe this really is 1968 all over again, with another Romney running behind another non-conservative Republican (Dick Nixon in ’68, Giuliani today) that conservatives nonethless adore. If only the Democrats could produce a Eugene McCarthy instead of a Hillary or Obama. Or, failing that, can we at least get Mitt Romney to say he was brainwashed into supporting the Iraq War?


2 thoughts on “The Party-Breaker

  1. André Kenji March 5, 2007 / 2:28 pm

    No Eugene McCarthy, no Frank Chuch, no George McGovern.

    What a pity….

  2. John Lowell March 5, 2007 / 10:20 pm


    We have to pick Guiliani, Mc Cain or Romney to avoid giving the appearance of preferring Eugene Mc Carthy to Clinton or Obama? Would that we might have a Eugene Mc Carthy as he was in the late 1960s given any of the major party bacteria currently out there. I think Ron Paul deserves a hard look but, please, not as a Republican. The entire system needs revamping, not simply the Republican Party. I’m embarrassed that I supported them as recently as 1992. Never again.

    John Lowell

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s